Under review after minor revision revision. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. Dec 17, 2024 · The academic Editor decision was as follows: Accept after minor revision. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and gives a final approval. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. Cn helpdesk@cwauthors. The decision was delayed, so I sent a reminder in the middle of October Nov 6, 2020 · I recently resubmitted a manuscript after making major revisions. ) I read the manuscript again and again and corrected a few Dec 30, 2019 · I submitted my revised manuscript to the journal after incorporating the reviewer's comments. My revised manuscript (after minor revision) is still under review for more than 3 months and I have not any response yet. The “Reject/Resubmit” should not be your recommendation unless there is some truly strong reason for allowing a 2nd revision — which you would need Dec 9, 2020 · Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Jun 13, 2018 · From wht I understand, you have re-submitted your manuscript after revision to the same journal and the status has changed from ‘Under review’ to ‘Revision’. After agreeing to review, external peer reviewers typically have 10 days to submit their review. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to Apr 13, 2018 · Only one reviewer was assigned after second revision and the paper is under review for last seven months. In consequence, peer review times do vary per journal. If the editor made a decision, it should be 'decision in progress'. I recently received two very positive reviews requiring minor edits in the IEEE Access journal. Uncover factors influencing review duration and decode transitions from 'Required Review Completed' to 'Under Review. Minor revision might also include providing more accurate explanations for some of the results or adding more results of control experiments that can be easily performed, that are not critical to supporting conclusions and that might not need further peer review for validation. After submission of the very minor revision (changes only in 10 sentence) and proofreading, I have got this After the revision, the paper is sent back to the reviewers for checking the corrections and making their final decisions. I submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal in January 2020. ’ I submitted the revised version, and now, the status is Under Review. I sent the review reports addressing all the comments raised by reviewers and letter Jul 22, 2022 · After submitting to one of the journals in Elsevier recently, we got a response as following: I think the manuscript can be improved and should be resubmitted, but the changes will probably take too long to accomplish within a "major revision" timeline. Oct 1, 2012 · In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. . However, the reviewer of my papers have pointed out some shortcomings of my paper. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. One reviewer suggested minor corrections and one reviewer suggested major corrections. Jan 1, 2023 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Even after minor reviews, it can take several weeks or even months for reviewers and editors to look at the paper again. major revision이나, minor revision이면 리뷰어의 심사에 따라 논문을 수정해서 보내야 한다. Jan 18, 2020 · After two revisions (the first major and the second minor), the Editor Assigned status means that the manuscript is with the Associate Editor (AE) to review the second round of changes and also the manuscript as a whole. Months later I received a "Minor Revision". After peer review, the editor makes a decision based on the reviewer(s) recommendation(s) and their own assessment, which can be any of the following: A-accept (almost never after the first review round) B-minor revisions required (no further formal external peer review round required, editor makes decision) C-revise & re-review Jul 22, 2021 · I have a paper on a Springer journal with "Accept - with minor revision with1-2 little modifications related to citations of the references and refereence list ". After that, the status date changed, but the status has remained unchanged (i. Jul 13, 2021 · After submitting major revision, I got minor revision with only one comment from editor, while one reviewer accepted it (it was not sent to second reviewer). However, after I performed minor edits and resubmitted it, it went to under-review. The paper is still in Under Review status. Jul 4, 2021 · On Jun 25, the status changed to Under Review right after i sent email to AE, and has remained so since then. I submitted an article to springer. Apr 5, 2021 · After sending the paper to a top journal, we received two positive feedbacks after 12 months, asking only for minor revisions. This, even though on the susy website under editor deciison there might be an “accept as it is” message. The editor believes that your paper has relatively high odds to be published following revision. Souhir Masmoudi. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. I submitted after the revision and received a reply stating that my paper could be accepted after a minor revision (provided the reviewer's queries are addressed). If I fix them, he will be pleased to reconsider his decision. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. Now status of manuscript is changed to Editor Assigned again. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Take the list of comments and suggestions and group them into categories, and then identify which require a minor revision and which require a major revision. 第一次pending editor decision将进两周. Also, as this is the third revision, we assume the latest is a minor revision. I had received the following recommendation: accept subject to optional revision. Jan 13, 2021 · I received a decision of ‘accept after minor revision’ for my submission to a Springer Nature journal. The journal office will follow up with late reviewers and keep you informed if there are any delays. These types of revisions include correcting or adding more references, improving the quality Nov 8, 2015 · I review many journal and conference papers frequently. Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. 5くらい)の日数をお見せします。 Apr 13, 2017 · 2 weeks of review time is really not very long, even for a minor revision (which, strictly speaking, yours apparently isn't, at least not to the editor). But our paper status is Technical Check In Progress. Around the end of last year, the journal changed its chief editor who was responsible for my article. Peer review times vary per journal. Feb 28, 2022 · Under review: When at least one reviewer agrees to review (status change from reviewer assigned to Under review). Feb 16, 2021 · Three revisions may be one more than standard, but that could be a good thing. If you're seeing 'under review', it's because the paper has been sent to reviewers. After that, it changed to Editor Assigned, and has been the same since January 17. Is it still with the associate editor or with the old reviewers. But the status of the paper is showing "under review" again. Jan 19, 2021 · After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. I re-submitted the paper after incorporating these changes in the manuscript (I work in Biology field). Jan 24, 2021 · I submitted my article to an Elsevier journal on August 5, 2020. after that, the status change to with editor and thereafter a decision Mar 5, 2018 · I received “minor revision” for my paper and resubmitted the revised manuscript. Cite. I sent an email to editor, who was handling my article, he said he can not see revised version on system. Then the status changed to “Decision in process”. A major revision often requires more Many factors contribute to this decision such as importance of the research, originality of the work, quality of the study, and priority of the work compared to other manuscripts under review. The main concern of the reviewer was to add the details in methods section and some amendments in the text. On December 5, I received a minor revision decision from one reviewer and a major revision decision from the other. Université de Saint-Etienne. Publish after minor revision, appropriate to select if you believe only simple revisions are necessary to make the manuscript worthy of publication. Dec 28, 2024 · After the authors address the reviewer concerns, after a minor revision, the Academic Editor can still send the paper to another round of reviews due to “some” concerns. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript Apr 28, 2019 · After major revision, two reviewers gave me minor revision (only change one word) and the editor was pleased to consider publication. What does it mean? Oct 1, 2024 · Under Review. I wanted to know how long it takes for the final decision made by the editor and reviewers. One reviewer's comment was for acceptance, while the other reviewer wanted clarification about the novelty of the results. The AE will use judgment in re-engaging the reviewers to perform the minor review. In addition, the academic editor initially assigned to it was also changed. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Reconsider after major revision 'Minor revisions’ means that a manuscript only has to undergo small changes and improvements before it can be published in an academic journal. Minor revisions will include formatting or writing suggestions and are typically issues you can easily address. To date, the status is “under review”. So we sent query to the editor. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. After 50 days of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested” and that the new version was required within one month. No, retracting after reviews is not ethical. After making the necessary adjustments, I resubmitted the revised manuscript on the 21st of November. On December 22, the status changed to Under Review, and has remained so since then. The status was changed to "Editorial assessment" soon, but 2 months have passed without progress since then. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. The revision can be minor, moderate, or major, and this is usually indicated in the decision letter and/or the manuscript status in the submission system. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. Minor Revision: The editors found your manuscript potentially acceptable for publication provided you make some minor adjustments. Step 10: Major Revision (MaR) of the Manuscript (45 days) Apr 27, 2020 · I submitted my manuscript to an SCI journal, and was asked to make some revisions. " What was odd was that the two reviewers for the second round did not talk about my revision at all, but treated the manuscript as a new submission. Based on this, it may take about two-three weeks for this round of review and for the final decision. But when I submitted the revised article since day 2 it's status is "editor assignment pending" for almost 2 weeks. Jul 8, 2015 · your answer make sense if article is in initial stage. Asking the author for any revision, re-opens the Editorial Manager so that the authors can upload a revised version. After a while, I received a message stating that the revisions I made have been accepted by the reviewers and I was only being asked to proofread the manuscript again to correct potential mistakes. I had a manuscript that was rejected after "minor revision. In second round of review, first reviewer checks whether all his/her comments have been addressed or not. After submitting the minor revision, the status changed to under review and pending approval. Nov 21, 2022 · Read 4 answers by scientists with 1 recommendation from their colleagues to the question asked by Sanyam Sharma on Nov 21, 2022 Oct 6, 2021 · I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal and received comments from two reviewers. " 2 days ago · Peer review is an integral part of the publishing process, learn more about the peer review process, including: what the reviewer is looking for, the possible outcomes of peer review, common reasons for rejection, what to do if your manuscript is rejected, and how to respond to the reviewer comments. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? Publish without revision, appropriate to select if you believe the manuscript is ready for publication. Sep 14, 2021 · Typically, a reviewer’s decision falls in four categories: acceptance without revision, acceptance after minor revision, acceptance after major revision, and rejection. I am anxious if there is any problem Mar 27, 2017 · Is it possible that after sending minor revisions my paper has gone for a fresh review again. What I have heard was that minor revision does not require another round Jul 12, 2016 · I have submitted a paper to a journal, and received the editors decision (Major Revision). Dec 22, 2015 · The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". The peer review process is handled by the conference committee, and the review method as well as the number of reports is decided by the conference organizers' requirements. ' Then, after two weeks, the status changed to 'Under Review,' and it was like this for 50 days. Sep 24, 2019 · Based on the nature and extent of revisions, he/she might consider sending it out for another round of review or go through it himself/herself and make a final decision. Mar 12, 2021 · This list will guide your revision of the paper. After second revision, the submission’s status changed from "major revision" to "with editor". Congratulations! Hi all, I am wondering how the minor revision sent back to review finally worked out. Depending on the extent of the minor revision, the editor may decide not to send it out for re-review. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. Then I received a reject letter from the new editor. These revisions were trivial, and so I resubmitted after one week. " This status has not been changed for a month. I then resubmitted the paper a month later. It is likely possible when paper sent new reviewer than earlier reviewers. While the reviewers had explicitly mentioned that there were minor issues, with about four issues a piece, the editor had requested a major revision. I answered all the reviewers and resubmitted the article. About two years ago, I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. What happens when you receive the decision letter? After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. ) 이 논문의 경우 minor revision이기 때문에 대체로 까다롭지 않은 간단한 수정만해서 보내면 게재될 수 있을 것으로 생각된다. It is slightly strange that the status 'Revision' is being displayed now although the submission system did not show this status during the previous rounds of review. As the revision was not so difficult, I submitted the revised manuscript in the middle of August. Moreover, careful revision for grammar and typos have been suggested. For the first round, I recieved a major revision and for the next two rounds, I received minor revisions. If a manuscript under revision is not re-submitted within 6 months or information on intended re-submission is not obtained, the submission may be terminated by formal rejection. Mar 5, 2021 · Hello, everyone. Well, the decision was <<"Revise for Jul 9, 2015 · active (under review), discuss, withdrawn, rejected, minor revision, major revision, accepted, no show, published. If you review a manuscript and struggle to formulate your feedback to reflect a 'minor revisions' verdict, look no further: get inspired by explanations, sample comments and examples! Contents When to decide Oct 13, 2020 · I had submitted my paper to a reputed journal. Apr 27, 2023 · After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. In case of a rejection, an article transfer will be considered. Nov 20, 2024 · The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. Aug 11, 2020 · I received a letter from the Editor stating that although my work is interesting and the results are correct, my paper contains typos, missing brackets, and punctuation marks. I am facing similar problem. The next status should make things clearer. I'm in a similar situation at the moment. I spoke with Elsevier’s journal Apr 15, 2019 · My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. 2. Dec 27, 2020 · 更新をさぼってしまった。 もうだいぶ前の話だけど、超Minor revisionだった論文を修正し再投稿した。細かい英語の記載ミスの指摘のみだったので、再投稿後すぐに受理されると思っていたが、ステータスがUnder reviewとなり、約2か月後にまたMinor revisionで戻ってきた。 最初の投稿時は査読者が2人 Hello all, I have an article under review after a major revision with a journal. that my manuscript requires minor revision. It all depends on the editor to adjudge the comments base on the merit of the paper. I did accordingly. Jul 8, 2019 · After resubmitting my revised manuscript on 20th of June, the status changed to 'under review' after only 4 days and then after 6 days (on 30th of June) it changed to 'required reviews completed. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable pending revision. But here the chances are 50:50 depending on the reviewers comments. Oct 8, 2018 · If the review is open and I know the author's name, I would consider refusing to review any more of this author's work, because there are few things more disrespectful of an academic than wasting his time. Unfortunately new referees can be invited by an editor when an old referee drops out by just not responding. If you After review you may get two options major or minor revision. And I am sure neither of them was the initial reviewer. Now, again it Minor revision might also include providing more accurate explanations for some of the results or adding more results of control experiments that can be easily performed, that are not critical to supporting conclusions and that might not need further peer review for validation. "major revision": The revised paper will require a second round of reviews. Today, another of my articles was accepted. After submitting major revision, my paper went for review, after that status again changed to "Under Review". 何日かは 論文誌や論文によって違うので、正確な数字は言えません 。 ただここでは例として、私が典型的だと思っている私の2つの論文(Nature communicationsとSensir and actuator IFは3. Then it will take probably one month to get your work accepted. Is that right? I got major revisions. e. The status was "With Editor" for one day, then on the next it changed to "reviewers assigned". com Refer a Friend. However, it is good to remember that an ‘accept with minor revisions’ decision does not guarantee acceptance. Aug 25, 2021 · If the paper is not with reviewers, the status should be 'with editor'. For all subsequent steps, please check Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance. Now, again it Dec 15, 2019 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. Feb 17, 2022 · However, it was under review for 5 months. I submitted the minor revision on the same day, status was with editor for 6 days but now its two weeks the status changed to Under Review. Jul 10, 2016 · Recently I submitted minor revision to springer journal. May 8, 2020 · I had submitted a paper to Catalysis Today (an Elsevier journal). But "minor revision" means "if you do the listed revisions, and they don't meaningfully change the content of the paper, it'll be accepted". In other cases, minor revisions can often involve some substantial work, and thus, there is a possibility (although typically small) that such a paper would not be subsequently accepted. After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. After waiting 20 days for pending approval, the status now is reviewers invited. -1. May 30, 2021 · The status of my manuscript is currently "under review" after a minor revision and I had resubmitted the revision. Sep 29, 2014 · Instances of this decision are also rather rare. After re-submission, the status changed from "under review" to "decision in process". Mar 10, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. I May 16, 2023 · Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to Nov 12, 2020 · I submitted my article earlier this year in January. and got a decision of "accept after minor revisions" with ~15 Publish without revision, appropriate to select if you believe the manuscript is ready for publication. One-and-a-half months after submitting the revised version, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed and has remained so for more than three weeks. Jan 7, 2019 · I have a paper on an Elsevier journal with "accept, minor revision". – Jul 26, 2018 · My case report, which was edited by Editage, received a minor revision request by a journal. ? Publish without revision, appropriate to select if you believe the manuscript is ready for publication. Did the second review after the minor revisions were done take longer than the first? Or was the first also long (80 days sounds quite long)? Thanks anyway. ’ What is going one? Is this a sign of acceptance or rejection? By the way, there were two reviewers at the beginning (who gave positive Mar 29, 2017 · A major revision goes back to reviewers, while the minor revision goes to the (associate) editor for a decision. After that, it changed to 'Under Review. Aug 27, 2021 · "minor revision": I don't need to see the revised paper again, it's okay if the editor considers the comments sufficiently addressed/incorporated. Required reviews completed: Minimum number of reviews has been received. These types of revisions include correcting or adding more references, improving the quality Any article submitted to any journal goes under review if found suitable and within the scope of that journal. On December 20, I submitted the revised article. Dec 13, 2024 · minor revision을 요청하는 레터에서 에디터는 "your manuscript is conditionally accepted pending revision" 라는 글을 주셨습니다. What actually happens with the manuscript depends on the editor and editorial policy. The two reviewers’ feedback were uploaded on 2 June 2023. 아래와 같은 decision letter를 받았을 때, It is common that the paper goes to the under review after minor revision while only two comments are addressed in the minor revision . Should I wait for them or write to them? Please suggest. 再等这么久评不上奖学金了 Sep 13, 2017 · Currently under review at the International Journal of Foo. After the submission of the second revision, the status was Under Review for 20 days. After one day, the status changed to 'With Editor. 2주간 with editor로 있길래 에디터가 결정을 할 건가 싶었는데, under review로 상태가 바뀌었습니다. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. I resubmitted the revised manuscript, after which the status showed that the review process had been completed. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. During the peer review process your article will show a status of ‘Under Review’. this status is not mentioned in Elsevier site! I'm confused about this statuses. Nov 21, 2020 · After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. Reconsider after major revision Mar 15, 2016 · A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. Also, the second round took 8 months. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? Nov 19, 2020 · Either it can be accepted (after one more minor revision) or it can be rejected. Reviewers remain anonymous unless they choose to identify themselves by signing their name to their Nov 7, 2017 · I submitted a manuscript to a BMC journal in the middle of July, and received a decision of minor revision in August. Both reviewers asked me to lengthen the introduction part and rewrite a convincing conclusion according to my research. Comments: In my opinion, the manuscript can be accepted after minor revision. major revision 때는 2일만에 under review로 바뀌었는데. There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society’s journals: Reject without review: The Action Editor has rejected the paper without sending it for peer review. After another month, I got back the review, asking to work on minor revisions. Should I worry about manuscript rejection? Thanks Jan 8, 2021 · I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. The comments were entirely new. After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it became "Editor assigned" again. and now after 40 days the status is still in that stage. ‘Under Review’) till now. Now, again it Feb 4, 2020 · Through Elsevier’s online system, I responded to the journal’s minor revision request. ' Now, after three weeks, the status date of the manuscript has changed, but the status remains 'Reviewers Assigned. But now, three weeks have passed and Aug 12, 2019 · I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. Since the reviewer requires small changes (clear some introduction background, and correct grammar), I think it is most likely minor revision and the review time should be shorter than the first review. For all subsequent follow ups I received the following reply “the responsible editor already decided to recommend, but the decision by a senior editor is Jul 31, 2015 · It's important to distinguish your case of "five minor typos" and the more general case of receiving an email "accepted subject to minor revisions". They have given a major revision decision twice. The status of my paper shows "accepted". However, although the paper went under review on 6th September, the status date of the paper have changed several times. If yes, then reviewer provides his/her minor and major comments. After two rounds of revision, the status has changed from ‘Required Review Completed’ to ‘Decision in Process. I got review reports after one month of submission. Now, more than one month has passed, but the status is still With Editor’ with a change in the date. If the status changes to “Under review,” it means that your paper has been sent to a reviewer again. Then, I have made all the necessary modifications and resubmitted. I revised the paper accordingly and addressed the feedbacks. Request a minor revision, where authors revise their manuscript to address specific concerns Request a major revision, where authors revise their manuscript to address significant concerns and In other words, if you receive such a revised manuscript for review, you should make either a recommendation to accept (possibly with a minor revision) or reject with no further consideration. ' Dive into the dynamics of manuscript status changes in peer review. May 2, 2018 · I got minor revision in the first round of review. PLOS ONE uses single-anonymized peer review. How can I add this new article citation to the first manuscript during the period under review? If the first manuscript was accepted can I add this citation at the page proof stage? Thank you for your time and attention. What could be the reason for the current status? Is the review process completed or are more reviewers required to [re Nov 6, 2023 · I submitted my manuscript on April 26th and I got the major revision in the first round and “accept after minor revision” in the second round. After one week, I submitted my revised manuscript, responding to all reviewers’ comments. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week Jun 23, 2021 · 请问下楼主。 投了一篇nutrients。 经历了一次大修后进入pending editor decsion 然后学术编辑决定accept after minor revision。 修回去，现在又变成pending editor decision（已经两天了） 这种会等多久啊. " Does this mean that my manuscript needs to go through another round of review? The review then continues from step 6 above. After 5 months I received a "Major revision". The first review was a major revision, then after submission of revision, within two months, I have received a minor revision. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. The status changed to Under Review on August 30. The article took 5 months and I got decision with minor revision. It roughly took around 19 days in total for this whole process. These types of revisions include correcting or adding more references, improving the quality Aug 4, 2021 · The ‘normal’ procedure is that once an editor received peer reviews of (at least) two reviewers you receive the request to respond (and send a revised manuscript). After the first review, it came back for a major revision. It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). There were 3-4 little modifications required by referees. The vast majority of minor revisions are ultimately accepted for publication, while many more major revisions are later found unacceptable and rejected. Decision Date: 14 April 2023 Then they sent it to the third review (with no required revision from us) on 20 May 2023. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for What's the difference between a minor and major revision? Response: A minor revision often implies that there are a limited number of changes that are needed to improve the manuscript for publication. The possible result of this review is acceptance of the manuscript, and the AE communicates the decision to the EiC for action. At least two review reports are collected for each submitted article. 18 As a rule of thumb, minor revision leads to a quick acceptance, usually without sending the Nov 24, 2016 · I have submitted my manuscript in one of the top journal of Elsevier. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. Jun 9, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). A minor revision is close to a contract to publish the paper if certain changes are made. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days Even the best papers could sometimes receive a major revision or rejection after an initial minor revision request. ' What does this mean? Does the status Jun 17, 2023 · This is different from checking a minor revision, which is often straightforward enough that it can jump the queue without unduly delaying other things. In my opinion, first round decides whether the quality and technicality of the paper is considerable or not. After 1 week, the submission’s status changed to "under review" and two weeks after that the status changed to "with editor". The status has been showing " under review " for a month now. We promptly did the revision and 6 months later we received the reports: one reviewer recommended acceptance and the other rejection, saying simply that the paper was not suitable for such a top journal. The academic editor can suggest reviewers during pre-check. After 10 months, I received a major revision and a minor revision decision by the [two] reviewers. There are three basic types of decisions: Accept, Revise, and Reject. In fact, I have submitted it on the 21st November 2019. I made the revision and resubmitted in the last week of November 2020. However, one of my article which was accepted with minor revision is now under "Editor Invited" status after the submission of revised version. The status was "With Editor" for three weeks, then it changed to "Under review". May 27, 2020 · I submitted my manuscript to a journal. What does this mean? Why is it taking Any article submitted to any journal goes under review if found suitable and within the scope of that journal. The day I submitted the revised version, the status was ‘With Editor'. However, expect a slightly longer wait at this time of the year due to the approaching holiday season. Just list it as what it is, under review. Oct 24, 2018 · I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). ' Is 8 days a long time to provide a final decision especially since the reviewers' responses were rather quick? Thank you for your answer. Feb 4, 2021 · I have submitted my manuscript to a Springer journal. According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. For context, I have currently been waiting just over two months to hear back about a minor revision (in pure math). It was rather an easy comment, so I resubmitted the case report after revision immediately. One reason to list your pending submissions can be to show what you have been working on in the last months, but it will not count as "achievement", even if you mention that it got an "accepted with major revisions". However, I have heard nothing from the journal for 3 weeks, though I assumed I would receive a response in a few days. And claiming for the paper to be accepted, only for the admissions committee to find out that it’s in fact still under review would count against you in the process. However, two months after submitting the revisions, the status of the submission is still "Editor Assigned". If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. It means the journal is quite interested in your article and is seeking to make it as robust as possible for publication. However, two days later, the status changed to ‘Under Review. After the resubmission was competed the status of the manuscript was finally changed to “under review” after “editorial assessment” after 6 months. Revise your paper. I have heard that reviewers are given 14 days to send their reports to the journal. After contacting him, I was told that he Nov 20, 2018 · I think that under consideration may significate under review through several time steps according to the revision process. The fate of the manuscript can not be predicted for a Feb 28, 2023 · I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. What will be the May 6, 2021 · The paper was accepted with minor revision (two reviewers both recommended 'minor revision'). After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. All of the sudden the statues changed to the revised version review from yesterday. ' However, after 15 days, it again changed to 'Reviewers Assigned. If it is taking long process of review time (more than 3 weeks) after minor revision then any revised decisions can be Jan 19, 2017 · My article was submitted to a journal last year and has undergone three rounds of reviews. For 3-4 days, the status of my manuscript status was showing to be Editor Assigned and after that status changed to Under Review. Revision decisions do Dec 24, 2019 · I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. Why is it Nov 16, 2015 · Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. Reject: The paper has been through the peer review process and the Minor changes will usually be assessed directly by the editor; If significant revisions were requested, the editor will usually return the manuscript to the original reviewers (unless they opted out of this) Rarely, the editor may invite comments from a new reviewer – the editor should explain why this fresh review is sought. But sometimes the reviewers do not return to the Editor within the time Feb 28, 2019 · Minor revisions - the best you can hope for after the first round of review Major revisions - the decision we received in this case Reject – clearly, the one you want to avoid; Editors are most likely to write back to you after initial review and recommend either ‘minor revisions’ or ‘major revisions’ to your paper. Dec 19, 2019 · In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. There were 3 different reviewers and they made very relevant comments that I found very useful. After submitting the minor revision, the statutes changed to the pending editorial decision for 1 month. ’ Could you tell me if this is bad news or good news? One of my journal papers was under review in a reputed journal for over 2 years. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. What is meaning of this change ? The most likely scenario seems to be that the editor send your work after minor revision to the referee who was asking for it. (I wasn't explicitly asked to send my paper for language editing. However, now, it has been over two weeks since I sent the revised manuscript, but the status is still showing as "With Editor". There is no way for us to know how long it will still take, but the unfortunate truth is that I see little reason to believe it's gonna be much faster than any previous (major) revision. For papers accepted after minor revision, the revised papers are often published without another full process of peer review. It was updated to ‘Under Review’ on December 10, 2020, and has remained so till date. heabgiie osj iywh hnm kzhdku ikdo vcyws bphj xawkfs rfxt